On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 08:29:14PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Aug 3, 2024 11:34:03 Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 12:10:00PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> >> Clang on higher optimization levels detects that NULL is passed to
> >> printf("%s") and warns about it.
> >> Avoid the warning.
> >
> > I don't see why this would be a problem, we do explicitly check for
> > NULL in our printf implementation and print "(null)". Or maybe it is
> > upset due to the attribute(printf) ? I don't know what the standard
> > says regarding %s and NULL, though. If it says that NULL is forbidden
> > then I can understand the warning and your fix is indeed correct. In
> > any case it's not worth fighting with a compiler for nolibc-test, but
> > it's probably worth mentioning in the commit message that it warns
> > despite the check being already done.
>
> It's undefined as per POSIX.
> I'll update the commit message.
OK, works for me!
Thanks,
Willy
