On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 05:45:49PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Can we please switch all this stuff to symbolic naming instead of > magic numbers? Given how much effort is going into the "automated > generation" thing, it is mind-boggling that the tests still rely on > handcrafted numbers. We just end-up with two different sets of bugs. > At the moment, the level of confidence I have in this stuff is > sub-zero. Yeah, I was wondering why this wasn't using the generated values especially given that the generated headers are available to tools - I wasn't sure if this was a deliberate decision to cross check the data entry or something. I'd certainly be happy to convert, though that does seem a bit invasive for a fix.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
