Re: [PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: add support for [v]sscanf()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/31/24 12:32, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
The implementation is limited and only supports numeric arguments.

It would help to add more details on why this is needed especially
in the commit log.


Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Thomas Weißschuh (2):
       tools/nolibc: add support for [v]sscanf()
       Revert "selftests: kselftest: Fix build failure with NOLIBC"

  tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h                 | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h          |  5 --
  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ae1f550efc11eaf1496c431d9c6e784cb49124c5
change-id: 20240414-nolibc-scanf-f1db6930d0c6

Best regards,





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux