Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] mm, memcg: cg2 memory{.swap,}.peak write tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:37:43AM GMT, David Finkel <davidf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Extend two existing tests to cover extracting memory usage through the
> newly mutable memory.peak and memory.swap.peak handlers.

BTW do the tests pass for you?

I gave it a try (v6.11-rc1+your patches)

$ grep "not ok 2" -B30 test.strace

...
315   15:19:13.990351 read(6, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4096
315   15:19:13.994457 read(6, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4096
315   15:19:13.998562 read(6, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4096
315   15:19:13.998652 read(6, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4096
315   15:19:14.002759 read(6, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096) = 4096
315   15:19:14.006864 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test/memory.current", O_RDONLY) = 7
315   15:19:14.006989 read(7, "270336\n", 127) = 7
315   15:19:14.011114 close(7)          = 0
315   15:19:14.015262 close(6)          = 0
315   15:19:14.015448 exit_group(-1)    = ?
315   15:19:14.019753 +++ exited with 255 +++
313   15:19:14.019820 <... wait4 resumed>[{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 255}], 0, NULL) = 315
313   15:19:14.019878 --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_EXITED, si_pid=315, si_uid=0, si_status=255, si_utime=1 /* 0.01 s */, -
313   15:19:14.019926 close(3)          = 0
313   15:19:14.020001 close(5)          = 0
313   15:19:14.020072 close(4)          = 0
313   15:19:14.024173 rmdir("/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test") = 0
313   15:19:14.028517 write(1, "not ok 2 test_memcg_current_peak"..., 33) = 33

grep "^315 .*read.*4096" -c test.strace
12800

Hopefully, unrelated to your changes. I ran this within initrd (rapido
image) so it may be an issue how rootfs pagecache is undercharged (due
to sharing?), instead of 50M, there's only ~256k.

To verify, I also tried with memory.peak patch reverted, failing
differently:

...
238   15:30:29.034623 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test/memory.current", O_RDONLY) = 3
238   15:30:29.034766 read(3, "52801536\n", 127) = 9
238   15:30:29.038895 close(3)          = 0
238   15:30:29.043048 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test/memory.stat", O_RDONLY) = 3
238   15:30:29.043230 read(3, "anon 52436992\nfile 0\nkernel 1105"..., 4095) = 870
238   15:30:29.047379 close(3)          = 0
238   15:30:29.051491 munmap(0x7f2473600000, 52432896) = 0
238   15:30:29.058516 exit_group(0)     = ?
238   15:30:29.062992 +++ exited with 0 +++
237   15:30:29.067054 <... wait4 resumed>[{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 238
237   15:30:29.067136 --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_EXITED, si_pid=238, si_uid=0, si_status=0, si_utime=1 /* 0.01 s */, si-
237   15:30:29.067210 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test/memory.peak", O_RDONLY) = 3
237   15:30:29.071349 read(3, "52805632\n", 127) = 9
237   15:30:29.075470 close(3)          = 0
237   15:30:29.075562 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test/memory.peak", O_RDWR|O_APPEND|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
237   15:30:29.079712 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test/memory.peak", O_RDWR|O_APPEND|O_CLOEXEC) = 4
237   15:30:29.083848 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test/memory.peak", O_RDWR|O_APPEND|O_CLOEXEC) = 5
237   15:30:29.083970 write(3, "reset\n\0", 7) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
237   15:30:29.088095 close(3)          = 0
237   15:30:29.092209 close(4)          = 0
237   15:30:29.092295 close(5)          = 0
237   15:30:29.096398 close(-1)         = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
237   15:30:29.100497 rmdir("/sys/fs/cgroup/memcg_test") = 0
237   15:30:29.100760 write(1, "not ok 2 test_memcg_current_peak"..., 33) = 33

This failure makes sense but it reminded me --
could you please modify the test so that it checks write permission
of memory.peak and skips the reset testing on old(er) kernels? That'd be
in accordance with other cgroup selftest that maintain partial backwards
compatibility when possible.

Thanks,
Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux