[PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling test_lru_map.c

[Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx>]

Although the post-increment in macro 'CPU_SET(next++, &cpuset)' seems safe,
the sequencing can raise compile errors, so move the increment outside the
macro. This avoids an error seen using gcc 12.3.0 for mips64el/musl-libc:

  In file included from test_lru_map.c:11:
  test_lru_map.c: In function 'sched_next_online':
  test_lru_map.c:129:29: error: operation on 'next' may be undefined [-Werror=sequence-point]
    129 |                 CPU_SET(next++, &cpuset);
        |                             ^
  cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Fixes: 3fbfadce6012 ("bpf: Fix test_lru_sanity5() in test_lru_map.c")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c
index 4d0650cfb5cd..fda7589c5023 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lru_map.c
@@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ static int sched_next_online(int pid, int *next_to_try)
 
 	while (next < nr_cpus) {
 		CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
-		CPU_SET(next++, &cpuset);
+		CPU_SET(next, &cpuset);
+		next++;
 		if (!sched_setaffinity(pid, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset)) {
 			ret = 0;
 			break;
-- 
2.34.1