As mentioned in the comment, the workaround for
__attribute__((no_stack_protector)) is only necessary on GCC.
Avoid applying the workaround on clang, as clang does not recognize
__attribute__((__optimize__)) and would fail.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h
index ac212e6185b2..41ebd394b90c 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-powerpc.h
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
_ret; \
})
-#ifndef __powerpc64__
+#if !defined(__powerpc64__) && !defined(__clang__)
/* FIXME: For 32-bit PowerPC, with newer gcc compilers (e.g. gcc 13.1.0),
* "omit-frame-pointer" fails with __attribute__((no_stack_protector)) but
* works with __attribute__((__optimize__("-fno-stack-protector")))
--
2.45.2
