Re: [PATCH] selftests: ksft: Track skipped tests when finishing the test suite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/22/24 09:43, Laura Nao wrote:
Consider skipped tests in addition to passed tests when evaluating the
overall result of the test suite in the finished() helper.

Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py
index cd89fb2bc10e..bf215790a89d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/ksft.py
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ def test_result(condition, description=""):
def finished():
-    if ksft_cnt["pass"] == ksft_num_tests:
+    if ksft_cnt["pass"] + ksft_cnt["skip"] == ksft_num_tests:
          exit_code = KSFT_PASS

Laura and Nícolas,

I saw both your emails explaining how this fixes the problem in
a previous patch.

However looks like you haven't see my response about the implications
of the exit_code = KSFT_PASS when tests are skipped.

if ksft_cnt["pass"] + ksft_cnt["skip"] == ksft_num_tests:
          exit_code = KSFT_PASS

Let me reiterate in case you missed it:

There is a reason why you don't want to mark all tests passed
when there are several skips.Skips are an indication that
there are several tests and/or test cases that couldn't not
be run because of unmet dependencies. This condition needs
to be investigated to see if there are any config options
that could be enabled to get a better coverage.

Including skips to determine pass gives a false sense security
that all is well when it isn't.

So it is incorrect to set the exit code to KSFT_PASS when there
are skipped tests.

+    if ksft_cnt["pass"] + ksft_cnt["skip"] == ksft_num_tests:


      else:
          exit_code = KSFT_FAIL

The logic here seems to not take into account when you have a
conditions where you have a mixed results of passed tests,
skipped tests, and failed tests.

Please revisit and figure out how to address this and report
the status correctly.

thanks,
-- Shuah






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux