On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 09:49:12AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>
> On 7/13/24 04:47, Remington Brasga wrote:
> > The string passed to ksft_test_result_skip is missing the `type_name`
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Remington Brasga <rbrasga@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > clang-tidy reported clang-diagnostic-format-insufficient-args warning
> > on this line, so I am fixing it.
> >
> > tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
> > index abe4d58d731d..6144f83f8ab4 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
> > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void test_hw_debug(pid_t child, int type, const char *type_name)
> > /* Zero is not currently architecturally valid */
> > ksft_test_result(arch, "%s_arch_set\n", type_name);
> > } else {
> > - ksft_test_result_skip("%s_arch_set\n");
> > + ksft_test_result_skip("%s_arch_set\n", type_name);
> > }
> > }
>
> Okay, I almost forgot that I had a patch fixing this as part of another series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240625122408.1439097-6-dev.jain@xxxxxxx/
> If that is OK, Will, can you please pull that? Or should I send that as a
> separate patch?
I think Mark already suggested sending that separately:
| This should ideally be a separate patch, there's no overlap.
and he's right: it's best to keep fixes and features separate.
Will
