On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 01:11:14PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 7/15/24 9:40 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 03:09:24PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> >> Hi Kees and All,
> >>
> >> There are several tests in kselftest subsystem which load modules to tests
> >> the internals of the kernel. Most of these test modules are just loaded by
> >> the kselftest, their status isn't read and reported to the user logs. Hence
> >> they don't provide benefit of executing those tests.
> >>
> >> I've found patches from Kees where he has been converting such kselftests
> >> to kunit tests [1]. The probable motivation is to move tests output of
> >> kselftest subsystem which only triggers tests without correctly reporting
> >> the results. On the other hand, kunit is there to test the kernel's
> >> internal functions which can't be done by userspace.
> >>
> >> Kselftest: Test user facing APIs from userspace
> >> Kunit: Test kernel's internal functions from kernelspace
> >
> > I would say this is a reasonable guide to how these things should
> > be separated, yes. That said, much of what was kind of ad-hoc kernel
> > internals testing that was triggered via kselftests is better done via
> > KUnit these days, but not everything.
> I started investigated when I found that kselftest doesn't parse the kernel
> logs to mark these tests pass/fail. (kselftest/lib is good example of it)
>
> >
> >> This brings me to conclusion that kselftest which are loading modules to
> >> test kernelspace should be converted to kunit tests. I've noted several
> >> such kselftests.
> >
> > I would tend to agree, yes. Which stand out to you? I've mainly been
> > doing the conversions when I find myself wanting to add new tests, etc.
> lib
> test_bitmap
> prime_numbers
> test_printf
> test_scanf
Yeah, these would be nice to convert.
> test_strscpy (already converted, need to remove this test)
Yup, converted in bb8d9b742aa7 ("string: Merge strscpy KUnit tests into string_kunit.c")
> lock
> test-ww_mutex module
> net
> test_blackhole_dev
I don't know these very well, but yeah worth looking into.
> user
> test_user_copy (probably already converted, need to remove this test)
This is done in -next via cf6219ee889f ("usercopy: Convert test_user_copy to KUnit test")
> firmware
> test_firmware
This might not work to convert: there's a userspace half for testing
firmware loading (see the kselftest side...)
> fpu
> test_fpu
Seems reasonable.
> Most of these modules are found in lib/*.
>
> Would it be desired to move these to kunit?
Checking with the authors/maintainer is probably the first thing to do;
check the git history to see who has been working on them.
--
Kees Cook
