Re: [PATCH] selftests/memfd:Fix a resource leak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/10/24 01:33, Zhu Jun wrote:
 From a good programming practice perspective, especially in more
complex programs, explicitly freeing allocated memory is a good habit.


The change looks good to me, however can you elaborate more on what
kind of leak your fixing here?

Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 7 +++++++
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
index 95af2d78fd31..f842a4aeb47d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
@@ -661,9 +661,11 @@ static void mfd_assert_grow_write(int fd)
  	l = pwrite(fd, buf, mfd_def_size * 8, 0);
  	if (l != (mfd_def_size * 8)) {
  		printf("pwrite() failed: %m\n");
+		free(buf);
  		abort();
  	}
+ free(buf);
  	mfd_assert_size(fd, mfd_def_size * 8);
  }
@@ -685,8 +687,11 @@ static void mfd_fail_grow_write(int fd)
  	l = pwrite(fd, buf, mfd_def_size * 8, 0);
  	if (l == (mfd_def_size * 8)) {
  		printf("pwrite() didn't fail as expected\n");
+		free(buf);
  		abort();
  	}
+
+	free(buf);
  }
static void mfd_assert_mode(int fd, int mode)
@@ -771,9 +776,11 @@ static pid_t spawn_thread(unsigned int flags, int (*fn)(void *), void *arg)
  	pid = clone(fn, stack + STACK_SIZE, SIGCHLD | flags, arg);
  	if (pid < 0) {
  		printf("clone() failed: %m\n");
+		free(stack);
  		abort();
  	}
+ free(stack);
  	return pid;
  }

thanks,
-- Shuah




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux