Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] selftests: kvm: s390: Add debug print functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue,  9 Jul 2024 14:57:00 +0200
Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Add functions to simply print some basic state information in selftests.
> 
> The output can be enabled by setting:
> 
>     #define TH_LOG_ENABLED 1
>     #define DEBUG 1
> 
> * print_psw: current SIE state description and VM run state
> * print_hex_bytes: print memory with some counting markers
> * print_hex: PRINT_HEX with 512 bytes
> * print_run: use print_psw and print_hex to print contents of VM run
>   state and SIE state description
> * print_regs: print content of general and control registers
> 
> All prints use pr_debug for the output and can be configured using
> DEBUG.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../selftests/kvm/include/s390x/debug_print.h | 78 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c       |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/debug_print.h
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/debug_print.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/debug_print.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7cc21596398e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390x/debug_print.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Definition for kernel virtual machines on s390x
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2024
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + *  Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_DEBUG_PRINT_H
> +#define SELFTEST_KVM_DEBUG_PRINT_H
> +
> +#include "kvm_util.h"
> +#include "sie.h"
> +
> +static inline void print_hex_bytes(const char *name, u64 page, size_t len)

"page" is not an appropriate name, it's just an address, right? "addr"
seems a more appropriate name

> +{
> +	pr_debug("%s (%p)\t\t8-0x08  12-0x0c  16-0x10  20-0x14  24-0x18  28-0x1c",
> +		 name, (void *)page);
> +	for (u8 pp_row = 0; pp_row < (len / 32); pp_row++) {
> +		pr_debug("\n %3d 0x%.3x ", pp_row * 32, pp_row * 32);
> +		for (u8 pp_block = 0; pp_block < 8; pp_block++)
> +			pr_debug(" %8x", *(((u32 *)page) + 8 * pp_row + pp_block));

why not printing in blocks of 64 bits? 

> +	}
> +	pr_debug("\n");
> +}
> +
> +static inline void print_hex(const char *name, u64 page)

same here s/page/addr/

> +{
> +	print_hex_bytes(name, page, 512);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void print_psw(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block)
> +{
> +	pr_debug("flags:0x%x psw:0x%.16llx:0x%.16llx exit:%u %s\n",
> +		 run->flags,
> +		 run->psw_mask, run->psw_addr,
> +		 run->exit_reason, exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
> +	pr_debug("sie_block psw:0x%.16llx:0x%.16llx\n",
> +		 sie_block->psw_mask, sie_block->psw_addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void print_run(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block)
> +{
> +	print_hex("run", (u64)run);
> +	print_hex("sie_block", (u64)sie_block);
> +	print_psw(run, sie_block);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void print_regs(int vcpu_fd)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_sregs sregs = {};
> +	struct kvm_regs regs = {};
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (ioctl(vcpu_fd, KVM_GET_REGS, &regs) != 0)
> +		TEST_FAIL("get regs failed, %s", strerror(errno));
> +	pr_debug("gprs:\n");

if you rewrite print_hex_bytes to print blocks of 8 bytes, you can
reuse it here:

> +	for (i = 0; i < 16; i += 4)
> +		pr_debug("0x%.16llx 0x%.16llx 0x%.16llx 0x%.16llx\n",
> +			 regs.gprs[i], regs.gprs[i + 1],
> +			 regs.gprs[i + 2], regs.gprs[i + 3]);
> +	if (ioctl(vcpu_fd, KVM_GET_SREGS, &sregs) != 0)
> +		TEST_FAIL("get sregs failed, %s", strerror(errno));
> +	pr_debug("acrs:\n");

acrs are 32 bits, you can print twice as many per row:

> +	for (i = 0; i < 16; i += 4)
> +		pr_debug("0x%.8x 0x%.8x 0x%.8x 0x%.8x\n",
> +			 sregs.acrs[i], sregs.acrs[i + 1],
> +			 sregs.acrs[i + 2], sregs.acrs[i + 3]);
> +	pr_debug("crs:\n");

and here you could reuse print_hex_bytes:

> +	for (i = 0; i < 16; i += 4)
> +		pr_debug("0x%.16llx 0x%.16llx 0x%.16llx 0x%.16llx\n",
> +			 sregs.crs[i], sregs.crs[i + 1],
> +			 sregs.crs[i + 2], sregs.crs[i + 3]);
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_DEBUG_PRINT_H */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> index 44945af6d47d..5c009ee27fd2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>   * Authors:
>   *  Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>   */
> +#include "debug_print.h"
>  #include "kselftest_harness.h"
>  #include "kvm_util.h"
>  #include "processor.h"





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux