Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: amend for wrong bpf_wq_set_callback_impl signature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 06 2024, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 1:54 PM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 15:44 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > See the previous patch: the API was wrong, we were provided the pointer
> > > to the value, not the actual struct bpf_wq *.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > Would it make sense to update one of the tests, so that it checks the
> > specific value put in the map?
> > E.g. extend struct elem:
> >
> > struct elem {
> >         int answer_to_the_ultimate_question;
> >         struct bpf_wq w;
> > };
> >
> > And put something in there?
> 
> +1
> let's tweak the selftest.

OK, v2 it is then :)

Cheers,
Benjamin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux