On 6/28/24 1:47 PM, Geliang Tang wrote:
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Every time run this BPF selftests (./test_sockmap) on a Loongarch platform,
a Kernel panic occurs:
'''
Oops[#1]:
CPU: 20 PID: 23245 Comm: test_sockmap Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #32
Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018
... ...
ra: 90000000043a315c tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420
ERA: 900000000426cd1c sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220
CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE)
EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE)
ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7)
ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0)
BADV: 0000000000000040
PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000)
Modules linked in: tls xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT
Process test_sockmap (pid: 23245, threadinfo=00000000aeb68043, task=...)
Stack : ... ...
...
Call Trace:
[<900000000426cd1c>] sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220
[<90000000043a315c>] tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420
[<90000000041cafc8>] __sock_sendmsg+0x68/0xe0
[<90000000041cc4bc>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x2bc/0x360
[<90000000041cea18>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xb8/0x120
[<90000000041cf1f8>] __sys_sendmsg+0x98/0x100
[<90000000045b76ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0
[<90000000030e1da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160
Code: ...
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
'''
This crash is because a NULL pointer is passed to page_address() in
sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter(). Due to the difference in architecture,
page_address(0) will not trigger a panic on the X86 platform but will panic
on the Loogarch platform. So this bug was hidden on the x86 platform, but
now it is exposed on the Loogarch platform.
This bug is a logic error indeed. In sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter(), an invalid
"sge" is always used:
if (msg->sg.copybreak >= sge->length) {
msg->sg.copybreak = 0;
sk_msg_iter_var_next(i);
if (i == msg->sg.end)
break;
sge = sk_msg_elem(msg, i);
}
If the value of i is 2, msg->sg.end is also 2 when entering this if block.
sk_msg_iter_var_next() increases i by 1, and now i is 3, which is no longer
equal to msg->sg.end. The break will not be triggered, and the next sge
obtained by sk_msg_elem(3) will be an invalid one.
The correct approach is to check (i == msg->sg.end) first, and then invoke
sk_msg_iter_var_next() if they are not equal.
Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/skmsg.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 44952cdd1425..1906d0d0eeac 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -378,9 +378,9 @@ int sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter(struct sock *sk, struct iov_iter *from,
/* This is possible if a trim operation shrunk the buffer */
if (msg->sg.copybreak >= sge->length) {
msg->sg.copybreak = 0;
- sk_msg_iter_var_next(i);
if (i == msg->sg.end)
break;
+ sk_msg_iter_var_next(i);
Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
sge = sk_msg_elem(msg, i);
}
