[PATCH] selftests/capabilities: Fix possible file leak in copy_fromat_to

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The open() function returns -1 on error. openat() and open() initialize
'from' and 'to', and only 'from' validated with 'if' statement. If the
initialization of variable 'to' fails, we should better check the value
of 'to' and close 'from' to avoid possible file leak.

Fixes: 32ae976ed3b5 ("selftests/capabilities: Add tests for capability evolution")
Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Found this error through static analysis.
---
 tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c b/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c
index 47bad7ddc5bc..de187eff177d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c
@@ -149,6 +149,10 @@ static void copy_fromat_to(int fromfd, const char *fromname, const char *toname)
 		ksft_exit_fail_msg("open copy source - %s\n", strerror(errno));
 
 	int to = open(toname, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_EXCL, 0700);
+	if (to == -1) {
+		close(from);
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg("open copy destination - %s\n", strerror(errno));
+	}
 
 	while (true) {
 		char buf[4096];
-- 
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux