From: Simon Horman
> Sent: 17 June 2024 11:34
...
> > sidenote: I like very much the idea to use the least powerful tool, like
> > sh vs bash, awk vs gawk, but it breaks when we forget what is outside of
> > the scope of the former/standard.
> > Perhaps for shell, we could convert all the selftests at once?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Now that you mention it, I have the same feelings.
>
> Do we ever expect to use the minimal tools, when other
> parts of the test suite depend on the enhanced ones?
Certainly trying to avoid bash-isms seems like a good idea.
Especially in scripts where it isn't really that hard.
OTOH avoiding posix features (so the script will run on a traditional SYSV /bin/sh)
is probably excessive.
I'd use "${foo%"${foo#?}"}" to get the first character without bash-isms.
But, IIRC, one version of ash/dash made a 'pig's breakfast' of the nested
pattern match.
(Most syntax highlighters don't get the quoting right either...)
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
