On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:37:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > @@ -616,6 +616,10 @@ static int write_and_verify(struct ctl_data *ctl, > if (!snd_ctl_elem_info_is_readable(ctl->info)) > return err; > > + /* Skip the verification for volatile controls, too */ > + if (snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info)) > + return err; > + I think we should do the checks in test_ctl_get_value() still - a read and then ctl_value_is_valid() on whatever we read. It doesn't need to match the value we wrote but it should still be valid for the control.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
