On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, Dev Jain wrote:
>
> On 6/12/24 16:14, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> > index 4f5881d4ef66d..695c45635d257 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/hyperv_cpuid.c
> > @@ -144,10 +144,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > free((void *)hv_cpuid_entries);
> > if (!kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX) ||
> > - !kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS)) {
> > - print_skip("Enlightened VMCS is unsupported");
> > - goto do_sys;
> > - }
> > + !kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS))
> > + ksft_exit_skip("Enlightened VMCS is unsupported\n");
> > +
>
> Isn't it incorrect to delete 'goto do_sys'? ksft_exit_skip() will exit and the
> program will never jump to that label. At other places too you have deleted the 'goto'.
Ya, exiting instead of continuing on will break these tests.
