On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:18 PM Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 20:15 +0000, Verma, Vishal L wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 15:10 -0500, Sagi Shahar wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:38 PM Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 12:46 -0800, Sagi Shahar wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > This is v4 of the patch series for TDX selftests. > > > > > > > > > > It has been updated for Intel’s v17 of the TDX host patches which was > > > > > proposed here: > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1699368322.git.isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > > > > The tree can be found at: > > > > > https://github.com/googleprodkernel/linux-cc/tree/tdx-selftests-rfc-v5 > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I wanted to check if there were any plans from Google to refresh this > > > > series for the current TDX patches and the kvm-coco-queue baseline? > > > > > > > I'm going to work on it soon and was planning on using Isaku's V19 of > > > the TDX host patches > > > > That's great, thank you! > > > > > > > > > I'm setting up a CI system that the team is using to test updates to > > > > the different TDX patch series, and it currently runs the KVM Unit > > > > tests, and kvm selftests, and we'd like to be able to add these three > > > > new TDX tests to that as well. > > > > > > > > I tried to take a quick shot at rebasing it, but ran into several > > > > conflicts since kvm-coco-queue has in the meantime made changes e.g. in > > > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c vcpu_setup(). > > > > > > > > If you can help rebase this, Rick's MMU prep series might be a good > > > > baseline to use: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240530210714.364118-1-rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > This patch series only includes the basic TDX MMU changes and is > > > missing a lot of the TDX support. Not sure how this can be used as a > > > baseline without the rest of the TDX patches. Are there other patch > > > series that were posted based on this series which provides the rest > > > of the TDX support? > > > > Hm you're right, I was looking more narrowly because of the kvm-coco- > > queue conflicts, for some of which even v19 might be too old. The MMU > > prep series uses a much more recent kvm-coco-queue baseline. > > > > Rick, can we post a branch with /everything/ on this MMU prep baseline > > for this selftest refresh? > > Actually I see the branch below does contain everything, not just the > MMU prep patches. Sagi, is this fine for a baseline? > Maybe for internal development but I don't think I can post an upstream patchset based on an internal Intel development branch. Do you know if there's a plan to post a patch series based on that branch soon? > > > > > > > > > > This is also available in a tree at: > > > > https://github.com/intel/tdx/tree/tdx_kvm_dev-2024-05-30 > > > > > > > > >
