On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 1:28 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Rob Herring (2024-06-04 06:05:26) > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:38:04PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > Describe a binding for a device that consumes a single clk in DT. This > > > will initially be used by a KUnit test to clk_get() the clk registered > > > by of_fixed_clk_setup() and test that it is setup properly. > > > > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../test/test,single-clk-consumer.yaml | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/test/test,single-clk-consumer.yaml > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/test/test,single-clk-consumer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/test/test,single-clk-consumer.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..8c384c48707d > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/test/test,single-clk-consumer.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/test/test,single-clk-consumer.yaml# > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > + > > > +title: Test consumer of a single clock > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > + > > > +description: > > > + A consumer of a single clock used in tests. > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + const: test,single-clk-consumer > > > > I don't know if there's much value in defining bindings for tests. We > > could alternatively make 'test,' opt out of everything. There's already > > some support in dtschema for this with 'foo,'. > > > > I need something for the DT unittest as well. > > > > Ok. So I should drop this patch and the other one that adds a binding > for the fake clock provider? Yes. > And replace it with something that makes > the test vendor prefix opt out of all checking? How is that done? Some > patch to dtschema directly? Yes, but I just added it for you. Rob
