On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:06:14PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:17:43PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > On Fri, 31 May 2024 07:50:33 +0200, > > I would say these are all bugs, they show the driver not correcting the > > value and allowing users to read back out of range values that were > > written. Even if the driver is accepting out of range values I'd expect > > it to transform them somehow when storing, the program will accept a > > mismatched read when testing this case but it will complain if the read > > value is not valid according to the control's info. > Ideally, yeah. But it's a whack-a-mole game, and my gut feeling is > that it'd be better to enable the input validation globally, something > like below. Yeah, I mean I tend to think the whole accepting invalid values thing is questionable to start off with so I do think that's a good idea. That said we probably should still be fixing the drivers as well.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
