Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] selftests/bpf: Use bpf_link attachments in test_sockmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 04:45 PM -07, John Fastabend wrote:
> Geliang Tang wrote:
>> On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 21:36 +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:12 AM -07, John Fastabend wrote:
>> > > Geliang Tang wrote:

[...]

>> > > The one advantage of test_sockmap is we can have it run for longer
>> > > runs by pushing different options through so might be worth keeping
>> > > just for that.
>> > > 
>> > > If you really want links here I'm OK with that I guess just asking.
>> > 
>> > It was me who suggested the switch to bpf_link in reaction to a
>> > series
>> > of cleanups to prog_type and prog_attach_type submitted by Geliang.
>> 
>> Yes, patches 3-5 address Jakub's suggestion: switching attachments to
>> bpf_link.
>
> OK. Lets just take them the series lgtm. Jakub any other comments?

Gave it a run - all looks well. Thanks for the patches.

Geliang, is there some MPTCP+sockmap use-case you're working towards?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux