Re: [PATCH 2/2] usercopy: Convert test_user_copy to KUnit test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/19/24 20:12, Kees Cook wrote:
Convert the runtime tests of hardened usercopy to standard KUnit tests.

Co-developed-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721174654.72132-1-vitor@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Hi Kees,

It looks great, just a couple of minor comments below.

  MAINTAINERS                                |   1 +
  lib/Kconfig.debug                          |  21 +-
  lib/Makefile                               |   2 +-
  lib/{test_user_copy.c => usercopy_kunit.c} | 252 ++++++++++-----------
  4 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)
  rename lib/{test_user_copy.c => usercopy_kunit.c} (52%)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 7c121493f43d..73995b807e5a 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -11761,6 +11761,7 @@ F:	arch/*/configs/hardening.config
  F:	include/linux/overflow.h
  F:	include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
  F:	kernel/configs/hardening.config
+F:	lib/usercopy_kunit.c
  F:	mm/usercopy.c
  K:	\b(add|choose)_random_kstack_offset\b
  K:	\b__check_(object_size|heap_object)\b
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index c63a5fbf1f1c..fd974480aa45 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2460,18 +2460,6 @@ config TEST_VMALLOC
If unsure, say N. -config TEST_USER_COPY
-	tristate "Test user/kernel boundary protections"
-	depends on m
-	help
-	  This builds the "test_user_copy" module that runs sanity checks
-	  on the copy_to/from_user infrastructure, making sure basic
-	  user/kernel boundary testing is working. If it fails to load,
-	  a regression has been detected in the user/kernel memory boundary
-	  protections.
-
-	  If unsure, say N.
-
  config TEST_BPF
  	tristate "Test BPF filter functionality"
  	depends on m && NET
@@ -2779,6 +2767,15 @@ config SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST
  	  This is intended to help people writing architecture-specific
  	  optimized versions.  If unsure, say N.
+config USERCOPY_KUNIT_TEST
+	tristate "KUnit Test for user/kernel boundary protections"
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  This builds the "usercopy_kunit" module that runs sanity checks
+	  on the copy_to/from_user infrastructure, making sure basic
+	  user/kernel boundary testing is working.
+
  config TEST_UDELAY
  	tristate "udelay test driver"
  	help
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index ffc6b2341b45..6287bd6be5d7 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_LKM) += test_module.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) += test_vmalloc.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_RHASHTABLE) += test_rhashtable.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_SORT) += test_sort.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_USER_COPY) += test_user_copy.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_STATIC_KEYS) += test_static_keys.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_STATIC_KEYS) += test_static_key_base.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_DYNAMIC_DEBUG) += test_dynamic_debug.o
@@ -406,6 +405,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_STRCAT_KUNIT_TEST) += strcat_kunit.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_STRSCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += strscpy_kunit.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_USERCOPY_KUNIT_TEST) += usercopy_kunit.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o diff --git a/lib/test_user_copy.c b/lib/usercopy_kunit.c
similarity index 52%
rename from lib/test_user_copy.c
rename to lib/usercopy_kunit.c
index 5ff04d8fe971..515df08b3190 100644
--- a/lib/test_user_copy.c
+++ b/lib/usercopy_kunit.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
  #include <linux/sched.h>
  #include <linux/slab.h>
  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
-#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
/*
   * Several 32-bit architectures support 64-bit {get,put}_user() calls.
@@ -31,11 +31,17 @@
  # define TEST_U64
  #endif
+struct usercopy_test_priv {
+	char *kmem;
+	char __user *umem;
+	size_t size;
+};
+
  #define test(condition, msg, ...)					\
  ({									\
  	int cond = (condition);						\
  	if (cond)							\
-		pr_warn("[%d] " msg "\n", __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__);	\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, cond, msg, ##__VA_ARGS__);	\
  	cond;								\
  })
It looks like the 'test' macro is not used anymore, so probably it should be removed.

@@ -44,13 +50,16 @@ static bool is_zeroed(void *from, size_t size)
  	return memchr_inv(from, 0x0, size) == NULL;
  }
-static int test_check_nonzero_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem, size_t size)
+/* Test usage of check_nonzero_user(). */
+static void usercopy_test_check_nonzero_user(struct kunit *test)
  {
-	int ret = 0;
  	size_t start, end, i, zero_start, zero_end;
+	struct usercopy_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	char __user *umem = priv->umem;
+	char *kmem = priv->kmem;
+	size_t size = priv->size;
- if (test(size < 2 * PAGE_SIZE, "buffer too small"))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, size, 2 * PAGE_SIZE, "buffer too small");
/*
  	 * We want to cross a page boundary to exercise the code more
@@ -84,8 +93,8 @@ static int test_check_nonzero_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem, size_t size)
  	for (i = zero_end; i < size; i += 2)
  		kmem[i] = 0xff;
- ret |= test(copy_to_user(umem, kmem, size),
-		    "legitimate copy_to_user failed");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_to_user(umem, kmem, size), 0,
+		"legitimate copy_to_user failed");
for (start = 0; start <= size; start++) {
  		for (end = start; end <= size; end++) {
@@ -93,35 +102,32 @@ static int test_check_nonzero_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem, size_t size)
  			int retval = check_zeroed_user(umem + start, len);
  			int expected = is_zeroed(kmem + start, len);
- ret |= test(retval != expected,
-				    "check_nonzero_user(=%d) != memchr_inv(=%d) mismatch (start=%zu, end=%zu)",
-				    retval, expected, start, end);
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, retval, expected,
+				"check_nonzero_user(=%d) != memchr_inv(=%d) mismatch (start=%zu, end=%zu)",
+				retval, expected, start, end);
  		}
  	}
-
-	return ret;
  }
-static int test_copy_struct_from_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem,
-				      size_t size)
+/* Test usage of copy_struct_from_user(). */
+static void usercopy_test_copy_struct_from_user(struct kunit *test)
  {
-	int ret = 0;
  	char *umem_src = NULL, *expected = NULL;
+	struct usercopy_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	char __user *umem = priv->umem;
+	char *kmem = priv->kmem;
+	size_t size = priv->size;
  	size_t ksize, usize;
- umem_src = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	ret = test(umem_src == NULL, "kmalloc failed");
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_free;
+	umem_src = kunit_kmalloc(test, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, umem_src);
- expected = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	ret = test(expected == NULL, "kmalloc failed");
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_free;
+	expected = kunit_kmalloc(test, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, expected);
/* Fill umem with a fixed byte pattern. */
  	memset(umem_src, 0x3e, size);
-	ret |= test(copy_to_user(umem, umem_src, size),
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_to_user(umem, umem_src, size), 0,
  		    "legitimate copy_to_user failed");
/* Check basic case -- (usize == ksize). */
@@ -131,9 +137,9 @@ static int test_copy_struct_from_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem,
  	memcpy(expected, umem_src, ksize);
memset(kmem, 0x0, size);
-	ret |= test(copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), 0,
  		    "copy_struct_from_user(usize == ksize) failed");
-	ret |= test(memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize), 0,
  		    "copy_struct_from_user(usize == ksize) gives unexpected copy");
/* Old userspace case -- (usize < ksize). */
@@ -144,9 +150,9 @@ static int test_copy_struct_from_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem,
  	memset(expected + usize, 0x0, ksize - usize);
memset(kmem, 0x0, size);
-	ret |= test(copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), 0,
  		    "copy_struct_from_user(usize < ksize) failed");
-	ret |= test(memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize), 0,
  		    "copy_struct_from_user(usize < ksize) gives unexpected copy");
/* New userspace (-E2BIG) case -- (usize > ksize). */
@@ -154,7 +160,7 @@ static int test_copy_struct_from_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem,
  	usize = size;
memset(kmem, 0x0, size);
-	ret |= test(copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize) != -E2BIG,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), -E2BIG,
  		    "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) didn't give E2BIG");
/* New userspace (success) case -- (usize > ksize). */
@@ -162,78 +168,46 @@ static int test_copy_struct_from_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem,
  	usize = size;
memcpy(expected, umem_src, ksize);
-	ret |= test(clear_user(umem + ksize, usize - ksize),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, clear_user(umem + ksize, usize - ksize), 0,
  		    "legitimate clear_user failed");
memset(kmem, 0x0, size);
-	ret |= test(copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), 0,
  		    "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) failed");
-	ret |= test(memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, memcmp(kmem, expected, ksize), 0,
  		    "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) gives unexpected copy");
-
-out_free:
-	kfree(expected);
-	kfree(umem_src);
-	return ret;
  }
-static int __init test_user_copy_init(void)
+/*
+ * Legitimate usage: none of these copies should fail.
+ */
+static void usercopy_test_valid(struct kunit *test)
  {
-	int ret = 0;
-	char *kmem;
-	char __user *usermem;
-	char *bad_usermem;
-	unsigned long user_addr;
-	u8 val_u8;
-	u16 val_u16;
-	u32 val_u32;
-#ifdef TEST_U64
-	u64 val_u64;
-#endif
-
-	kmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!kmem)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE * 2,
-			    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
-			    MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0);
-	if (user_addr >= (unsigned long)(TASK_SIZE)) {
-		pr_warn("Failed to allocate user memory\n");
-		kfree(kmem);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	struct usercopy_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	char __user *usermem = priv->umem;
+	char *kmem = priv->kmem;
- usermem = (char __user *)user_addr;
-	bad_usermem = (char *)user_addr;
-
-	/*
-	 * Legitimate usage: none of these copies should fail.
-	 */
  	memset(kmem, 0x3a, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
-	ret |= test(copy_to_user(usermem, kmem, PAGE_SIZE),
-		    "legitimate copy_to_user failed");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0, copy_to_user(usermem, kmem, PAGE_SIZE),
+	     "legitimate copy_to_user failed");
  	memset(kmem, 0x0, PAGE_SIZE);
-	ret |= test(copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, PAGE_SIZE),
-		    "legitimate copy_from_user failed");
-	ret |= test(memcmp(kmem, kmem + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE),
-		    "legitimate usercopy failed to copy data");
-
-#define test_legit(size, check)						  \
-	do {								  \
-		val_##size = check;					  \
-		ret |= test(put_user(val_##size, (size __user *)usermem), \
-		    "legitimate put_user (" #size ") failed");		  \
-		val_##size = 0;						  \
-		ret |= test(get_user(val_##size, (size __user *)usermem), \
-		    "legitimate get_user (" #size ") failed");		  \
-		ret |= test(val_##size != check,			  \
-		    "legitimate get_user (" #size ") failed to do copy"); \
-		if (val_##size != check) {				  \
-			pr_info("0x%llx != 0x%llx\n",			  \
-				(unsigned long long)val_##size,		  \
-				(unsigned long long)check);		  \
-		}							  \
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0, copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, PAGE_SIZE),
+	     "legitimate copy_from_user failed");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0, memcmp(kmem, kmem + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE),
+	     "legitimate usercopy failed to copy data");
+
+#define test_legit(size, check)						\
+	do {								\
+		size val_##size = (check);				\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0,				\
+			put_user(val_##size, (size __user *)usermem),	\
+			"legitimate put_user (" #size ") failed");	\
+		val_##size = 0;						\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0,				\
+			get_user(val_##size, (size __user *)usermem),	\
+			"legitimate get_user (" #size ") failed");	\
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, val_##size, check,		\
+			"legitimate get_user (" #size ") failed to do copy"); \
  	} while (0)
test_legit(u8, 0x5a);
@@ -243,27 +217,29 @@ static int __init test_user_copy_init(void)
  	test_legit(u64, 0x5a5b5c5d6a6b6c6d);
  #endif
  #undef test_legit
+}
- /* Test usage of check_nonzero_user(). */
-	ret |= test_check_nonzero_user(kmem, usermem, 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
-	/* Test usage of copy_struct_from_user(). */
-	ret |= test_copy_struct_from_user(kmem, usermem, 2 * PAGE_SIZE);
-
-	/*
-	 * Invalid usage: none of these copies should succeed.
-	 */
+/*
+ * Invalid usage: none of these copies should succeed.
+ */
+static void usercopy_test_invalid(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct usercopy_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	char __user *usermem = priv->umem;
+	char *bad_usermem = (char *)usermem;
+	char *kmem = priv->kmem;
/* Prepare kernel memory with check values. */
  	memset(kmem, 0x5a, PAGE_SIZE);
  	memset(kmem + PAGE_SIZE, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
/* Reject kernel-to-kernel copies through copy_from_user(). */
-	ret |= test(!copy_from_user(kmem, (char __user *)(kmem + PAGE_SIZE),
-				    PAGE_SIZE),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, copy_from_user(kmem, (char __user *)(kmem + PAGE_SIZE),
+						 PAGE_SIZE), 0,
  		    "illegal all-kernel copy_from_user passed");
/* Destination half of buffer should have been zeroed. */
-	ret |= test(memcmp(kmem + PAGE_SIZE, kmem, PAGE_SIZE),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, memcmp(kmem + PAGE_SIZE, kmem, PAGE_SIZE), 0,
  		    "zeroing failure for illegal all-kernel copy_from_user");
#if 0
@@ -273,29 +249,25 @@ static int __init test_user_copy_init(void)
  	 * to be tested in LKDTM instead, since this test module does not
  	 * expect to explode.
  	 */
-	ret |= test(!copy_from_user(bad_usermem, (char __user *)kmem,
-				    PAGE_SIZE),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, copy_from_user(bad_usermem, (char __user *)kmem,
+						 PAGE_SIZE), 0,
  		    "illegal reversed copy_from_user passed");
  #endif
-	ret |= test(!copy_to_user((char __user *)kmem, kmem + PAGE_SIZE,
-				  PAGE_SIZE),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, copy_to_user((char __user *)kmem, kmem + PAGE_SIZE,
+					       PAGE_SIZE), 0,
  		    "illegal all-kernel copy_to_user passed");
-	ret |= test(!copy_to_user((char __user *)kmem, bad_usermem,
-				  PAGE_SIZE),
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, copy_to_user((char __user *)kmem, bad_usermem,
+					       PAGE_SIZE), 0,
  		    "illegal reversed copy_to_user passed");
#define test_illegal(size, check) \
  	do {								    \
-		val_##size = (check);					    \
-		ret |= test(!get_user(val_##size, (size __user *)kmem),	    \
+		size val_##size = (check);					    \
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, get_user(val_##size, (size __user *)kmem), 0, \
  		    "illegal get_user (" #size ") passed");		    \
-		ret |= test(val_##size != (size)0,			    \
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, val_##size, 0,		    \
  		    "zeroing failure for illegal get_user (" #size ")");    \
-		if (val_##size != (size)0) {				    \
-			pr_info("0x%llx != 0\n",			    \
-				(unsigned long long)val_##size);	    \
-		}							    \
-		ret |= test(!put_user(val_##size, (size __user *)kmem),	    \
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, put_user(val_##size, (size __user *)kmem), 0, \
  		    "illegal put_user (" #size ") passed");		    \
  	} while (0)
@@ -306,26 +278,46 @@ static int __init test_user_copy_init(void)
  	test_illegal(u64, 0x5a5b5c5d6a6b6c6d);
  #endif
  #undef test_illegal
+}
- vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
-	kfree(kmem);
+static int usercopy_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct usercopy_test_priv *priv;
+	unsigned long user_addr;
- if (ret == 0) {
-		pr_info("tests passed.\n");
-		return 0;
-	}
+	priv = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!priv)
+		return -ENOMEM;

Should the check be done with KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL here as well, as it is done with priv->kmem?

+	test->priv = priv;
+	priv->size = PAGE_SIZE * 2;
- return -EINVAL;
-}
+	priv->kmem = kunit_kmalloc(test, priv->size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv->kmem);
-module_init(test_user_copy_init);
+	user_addr = kunit_vm_mmap(test, NULL, 0, priv->size,
+			    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
+			    MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, user_addr, (unsigned long)TASK_SIZE,
+		"Failed to allocate user memory");
+	priv->umem = (char __user *)user_addr;
-static void __exit test_user_copy_exit(void)
-{
-	pr_info("unloaded.\n");
+	return 0;
  }
-module_exit(test_user_copy_exit);
-
+static struct kunit_case usercopy_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(usercopy_test_valid),
+	KUNIT_CASE(usercopy_test_invalid),
+	KUNIT_CASE(usercopy_test_check_nonzero_user),
+	KUNIT_CASE(usercopy_test_copy_struct_from_user),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite usercopy_test_suite = {
+	.name = "usercopy",
+	.init = usercopy_test_init,
+	.test_cases = usercopy_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&usercopy_test_suite);
  MODULE_AUTHOR("Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

Other than that,

Tested-by: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Kind regards,
Ivan Orlov





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux