Hi Barnabás
Is that OK that I work on V2 ? It will be based on your V1 change and
I will also add more test cases.
Thanks
-Jeff
-
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 12:45 PM Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2024 19:32:35 -0700 Jeff Xu <jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > It's a change to a userspace API, yes? Please let's have a detailed
> > > description of why this is OK. Why it won't affect any existing users.
> > >
> > Unfortunately, this is a breaking change that might break a
> > application if they do below:
> > memfd_create("", MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL)
> > fcntl(fd, F_ADD_SEALS, F_SEAL_WRITE); <-- this will fail in new
> > semantics, due to mfd not being sealable.
> >
> > However, I still think the new semantics is a better, the reason is
> > due to the sysctl: memfd_noexec_scope
> > Currently, when the sysctl is set to MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL
> > kernel adds MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL to memfd_create, and the memfd becomes sealable.
> > E.g.
> > When the sysctl is set to MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_SEAL
> > The app calls memfd_create("",0)
> > application will get sealable memfd, which might be a surprise to application.
> >
> > If the app doesn't want this behavior, they will need one of two below
> > in current implementation.
> > 1>
> > set the sysctl: memfd_noexec_scope to 0.
> > So the kernel doesn't overwrite the mdmfd_create
> >
> > 2>
> > modify their code to get non-sealable NOEXEC memfd.
> > memfd_create("", MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC)
> > fcntl(fd, F_ADD_SEALS, F_SEAL_SEAL)
> >
> > The new semantics works better with the sysctl.
> >
> > Since memfd noexec is new, maybe there is no application using the
> > MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL to create
> > sealable memfd. They mostly likely use
> > memfd(MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL|MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) instead.
> > I think it might benefit in the long term with the new semantics.
>
> Yes, it's new so I expect any damage will be small. Please prepare a
> v2 which fully explains/justifies the thinking for this
> non-backward-compatible change and which include the cc:stable.
>
>
