On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 05:04:55PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> Since a few extensions (Zicbom/Zicboz) already needs validation and
> future ones will need it as well (Zc*) add a validate() callback to
> struct riscv_isa_ext_data. This require to rework the way extensions are
> parsed and split it in two phases. First phase is isa string or isa
> extension list parsing and consists in enabling all the extensions in a
> temporary bitmask without any validation. The second step "resolves" the
> final isa bitmap, handling potential missing dependencies. The mechanism
> is quite simple and simply validate each extension described in the
> temporary bitmap before enabling it in the final isa bitmap. validate()
> callbacks can return either 0 for success, -EPROBEDEFER if extension
> needs to be validated again at next loop. A previous ISA bitmap is kept
> to avoid looping mutliple times if an extension dependencies are never
> satisfied until we reach a stable state. In order to avoid any potential
> infinite looping, allow looping a maximum of the number of extension we
> handle. Zicboz and Zicbom extensions are modified to use this validation
> mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 347805446151..000796c2d0b1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct riscv_isa_ext_data {
> const char *property;
> const unsigned int *subset_ext_ids;
> const unsigned int subset_ext_size;
> + int (*validate)(const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *data, const unsigned long *isa_bitmap);
> };
>
> extern const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[];
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 115ba001f1bc..cb2ffa6c8c33 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -72,51 +72,58 @@ bool __riscv_isa_extension_available(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap, unsigned i
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__riscv_isa_extension_available);
>
> -static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id)
> +static bool riscv_isa_extension_valid(int id)
> {
> - switch (id) {
> - case RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM:
> - if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) {
> - pr_err("Zicbom detected in ISA string, disabling as no cbom-block-size found\n");
> - return false;
> - } else if (!is_power_of_2(riscv_cbom_block_size)) {
> - pr_err("Zicbom disabled as cbom-block-size present, but is not a power-of-2\n");
> - return false;
> - }
> - return true;
> - case RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ:
> - if (!riscv_cboz_block_size) {
> - pr_err("Zicboz detected in ISA string, disabling as no cboz-block-size found\n");
> - return false;
> - } else if (!is_power_of_2(riscv_cboz_block_size)) {
> - pr_err("Zicboz disabled as cboz-block-size present, but is not a power-of-2\n");
> - return false;
> - }
> - return true;
> - case RISCV_ISA_EXT_INVALID:
> - return false;
> + return id != RISCV_ISA_EXT_INVALID;
> +}
> +
> +static int riscv_ext_zicbom_validate(const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *data,
> + const unsigned long *isa_bitmap)
> +{
> + if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) {
> + pr_err("Zicbom detected in ISA string, disabling as no cbom-block-size found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (!is_power_of_2(riscv_cbom_block_size)) {
I guess the original code did this too, but as the branches return the
else here should go.
> + pr_err("Zicbom disabled as cbom-block-size present, but is not a power-of-2\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> - return true;
> +static int riscv_ext_zicboz_validate(const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *data,
> + const unsigned long *isa_bitmap)
> +{
> + if (!riscv_cboz_block_size) {
> + pr_err("Zicboz detected in ISA string, disabling as no cboz-block-size found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (!is_power_of_2(riscv_cboz_block_size)) {
> + pr_err("Zicboz disabled as cboz-block-size present, but is not a power-of-2\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -#define _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _subset_exts, _subset_exts_size) { \
> - .name = #_name, \
> - .property = #_name, \
> - .id = _id, \
> - .subset_ext_ids = _subset_exts, \
> - .subset_ext_size = _subset_exts_size \
> +#define _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _subset_exts, _subset_exts_size, _validate) { \
> + .name = #_name, \
> + .property = #_name, \
> + .id = _id, \
> + .subset_ext_ids = _subset_exts, \
> + .subset_ext_size = _subset_exts_size, \
> + .validate = _validate \
> }
>
> -#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id) _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, NULL, 0)
> +#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id) _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, NULL, 0, NULL)
>
> /* Used to declare pure "lasso" extension (Zk for instance) */
> #define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_BUNDLE(_name, _bundled_exts) \
> - _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, RISCV_ISA_EXT_INVALID, _bundled_exts, ARRAY_SIZE(_bundled_exts))
> + _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, RISCV_ISA_EXT_INVALID, _bundled_exts, \
> + ARRAY_SIZE(_bundled_exts), NULL)
>
> /* Used to declare extensions that are a superset of other extensions (Zvbb for instance) */
> #define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(_name, _id, _sub_exts) \
> - _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _sub_exts, ARRAY_SIZE(_sub_exts))
> + _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _sub_exts, ARRAY_SIZE(_sub_exts), NULL)
> +#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(_name, _id, _sub_exts, _validate) \
> + _RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(_name, _id, _sub_exts, ARRAY_SIZE(_sub_exts), _validate)
>
> static const unsigned int riscv_zk_bundled_exts[] = {
> RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB,
> @@ -247,8 +254,10 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(c, RISCV_ISA_EXT_c),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(v, RISCV_ISA_EXT_v),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(h, RISCV_ISA_EXT_h),
> - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
> - __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts),
> + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts,
> + riscv_ext_zicbom_validate),
> + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts,
> + riscv_ext_zicboz_validate),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicntr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicond, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICOND),
> __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicsr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR),
> @@ -310,33 +319,80 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
>
> const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count = ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_isa_ext);
>
> -static void __init match_isa_ext(const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *ext, const char *name,
> - const char *name_end, struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo)
> +static void riscv_isa_set_ext(const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *ext, unsigned long *bitmap)
> {
> - if ((name_end - name == strlen(ext->name)) &&
> - !strncasecmp(name, ext->name, name_end - name)) {
> - /*
> - * If this is a bundle, enable all the ISA extensions that
> - * comprise the bundle.
> - */
> - if (ext->subset_ext_size) {
> - for (int i = 0; i < ext->subset_ext_size; i++) {
> - if (riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->subset_ext_ids[i]))
> - set_bit(ext->subset_ext_ids[i], isainfo->isa);
> - }
> + /*
> + * This is valid even for bundle extensions which uses the RISCV_ISA_EXT_INVALID id
> + * (rejected by riscv_isa_extension_valid()).
I really don't understand what this comment is trying to say.
I think what you're trying to say is that it is safe to call
riscv_isa_extension_valid() for bundles, but wouldn't it just be clearer
to drop the function calls and do the comparison to ..._INVALID here
since riscv_isa_extension_valid() has been reduced to just that single
comparison?
I'd understand this function looking as it did if
riscv_isa_extension_valid() was more than a oneliner.
> + */
> + if (riscv_isa_extension_valid(ext->id))
> + set_bit(ext->id, bitmap);
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < ext->subset_ext_size; i++) {
> + if (riscv_isa_extension_valid(ext->subset_ext_ids[i]))
> + set_bit(ext->subset_ext_ids[i], bitmap);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void __init riscv_resolve_isa(unsigned long *isa_bitmap, struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo,
> + unsigned long *this_hwcap, unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
This function is badly in need of some new variable names for the first
two parameters. It's hard to follow what each of them is meant to be
once you're inside this function and removed from their definitions.
The first parameter is the source bitmap that we've already filled from
the dt/acpi scan of that hart and the second is the per-hart data
structure that we're gonna assign it to and keep "forever", I think the
naming should reflect that.
> +{
> + bool loop;
> + const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *ext;
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(prev_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX);
> + int max_loop_count = riscv_isa_ext_count, ret;
> +
> + do {
> + loop = false;
> + if (max_loop_count-- < 0) {
> + pr_err("Failed to reach a stable ISA state\n");
> + return;
> }
> + memcpy(prev_bitmap, isainfo->isa, sizeof(prev_bitmap));
Why not bitmap_copy()?
> + for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) {
Why would we even be testing extensions that have been disabled rather
than iterating just over the set that has been turned on? IOW, does
for_each_set_bit() work here?
> + ext = &riscv_isa_ext[i];
> +
> + /* Bundle extensions ids are invalid*/
> + if (!riscv_isa_extension_valid(ext->id))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!test_bit(ext->id, isa_bitmap) || test_bit(ext->id, isainfo->isa))
> + continue;
What's this test excluding? I think this deserves a comment.
> +
> + if (ext->validate) {
> + ret = ext->validate(ext, isainfo->isa);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + loop = true;
> + else
> + clear_bit(ext->id, isa_bitmap);
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
>
> - /*
> - * This is valid even for bundle extensions which uses the RISCV_ISA_EXT_INVALID id
> - * (rejected by riscv_isa_extension_check()).
> - */
> - if (riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->id))
> set_bit(ext->id, isainfo->isa);
> +
> + /* Only single letter extensions get set in hwcap */
> + if (ext->id < RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE)
> + *this_hwcap |= isa2hwcap[ext->id];
> + }
> + } while (loop && memcmp(prev_bitmap, isainfo->isa, sizeof(prev_bitmap)));
> +}
> +
> +static void __init match_isa_ext(const char *name, const char *name_end, unsigned long *bitmap)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) {
> + const struct riscv_isa_ext_data *ext = &riscv_isa_ext[i];
> +
> + if ((name_end - name == strlen(ext->name)) &&
> + !strncasecmp(name, ext->name, name_end - name)) {
> + riscv_isa_set_ext(ext, bitmap);
> + break;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> -static void __init riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo,
> - unsigned long *isa2hwcap, const char *isa)
> +static void __init riscv_resolve_isa_string(const char *isa, unsigned long *bitmap)
I don't see why this needs to be renamed, I think the original name here
was fine - and the new name makes the operation of the caller of this
function less clear to me.
> {
> /*
> * For all possible cpus, we have already validated in
> @@ -349,7 +405,7 @@ static void __init riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct risc
> while (*isa) {
> const char *ext = isa++;
> const char *ext_end = isa;
> - bool ext_long = false, ext_err = false;
> + bool ext_err = false;
>
> switch (*ext) {
> case 's':
> @@ -389,7 +445,6 @@ static void __init riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct risc
> * character itself while eliminating the extensions version number.
> * A simple re-increment solves this problem.
> */
> - ext_long = true;
> for (; *isa && *isa != '_'; ++isa)
> if (unlikely(!isalnum(*isa)))
> ext_err = true;
> @@ -469,17 +524,8 @@ static void __init riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct risc
>
> if (unlikely(ext_err))
> continue;
> - if (!ext_long) {
> - int nr = tolower(*ext) - 'a';
>
> - if (riscv_isa_extension_check(nr)) {
> - *this_hwcap |= isa2hwcap[nr];
> - set_bit(nr, isainfo->isa);
> - }
> - } else {
> - for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++)
> - match_isa_ext(&riscv_isa_ext[i], ext, ext_end, isainfo);
> - }
> + match_isa_ext(ext, ext_end, bitmap);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -501,6 +547,7 @@ static void __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu];
I think this code would, and the non-string variant below, benefit from
a similar renaming to make the "flow" of information clearer.
In general tho, this stuff looks sane to me. There's a bunch of moving
pieces at the moment with various extensions, so I hope that some of
them (the vector subsets & the non-vector parts (1-9) of Charlie's series
for vendor stuff maybe) get merged as 6.10 material so that we can
reduce what's in play while we try to add this stuff.
I'll suggest that to Palmer tomorrow I think..
Cheers,
Conor.
> unsigned long this_hwcap = 0;
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX) = { 0 };
>
> if (acpi_disabled) {
> node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> @@ -523,7 +570,7 @@ static void __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> }
> }
>
> - riscv_parse_isa_string(&this_hwcap, isainfo, isa2hwcap, isa);
> + riscv_resolve_isa_string(isa, isa_bitmap);
>
> /*
> * These ones were as they were part of the base ISA when the
> @@ -531,10 +578,10 @@ static void __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> * unconditionally where `i` is in riscv,isa on DT systems.
> */
> if (acpi_disabled) {
> - set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR, isainfo->isa);
> - set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI, isainfo->isa);
> - set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR, isainfo->isa);
> - set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM, isainfo->isa);
> + set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR, isa_bitmap);
> + set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI, isa_bitmap);
> + set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICNTR, isa_bitmap);
> + set_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM, isa_bitmap);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -548,9 +595,11 @@ static void __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> if (acpi_disabled && riscv_cached_mvendorid(cpu) == THEAD_VENDOR_ID &&
> riscv_cached_marchid(cpu) == 0x0) {
> this_hwcap &= ~isa2hwcap[RISCV_ISA_EXT_v];
> - clear_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, isainfo->isa);
> + clear_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, isa_bitmap);
> }
>
> + riscv_resolve_isa(isa_bitmap, isainfo, &this_hwcap, isa2hwcap);
> +
> /*
> * All "okay" hart should have same isa. Set HWCAP based on
> * common capabilities of every "okay" hart, in case they don't
> @@ -579,6 +628,7 @@ static int __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_ext_list(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> unsigned long this_hwcap = 0;
> struct device_node *cpu_node;
> struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu];
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(isa_bitmap, RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX) = { 0 };
>
> cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> if (!cpu_node) {
> @@ -598,22 +648,11 @@ static int __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_ext_list(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> ext->property) < 0)
> continue;
>
> - if (ext->subset_ext_size) {
> - for (int j = 0; j < ext->subset_ext_size; j++) {
> - if (riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->subset_ext_ids[i]))
> - set_bit(ext->subset_ext_ids[j], isainfo->isa);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (riscv_isa_extension_check(ext->id)) {
> - set_bit(ext->id, isainfo->isa);
> -
> - /* Only single letter extensions get set in hwcap */
> - if (strnlen(riscv_isa_ext[i].name, 2) == 1)
> - this_hwcap |= isa2hwcap[riscv_isa_ext[i].id];
> - }
> + riscv_isa_set_ext(ext, isa_bitmap);
> }
>
> + riscv_resolve_isa(isa_bitmap, isainfo, &this_hwcap, isa2hwcap);
> +
> of_node_put(cpu_node);
>
> /*
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
