On 5/10/24 2:58 PM, kunwu.chan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
> Add the malloc failure checking to avoid possible null
> dereference and give more information
> about test fail reasons.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
> index 5a4491d4edfe..bde63e1f74dc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
> @@ -1100,6 +1100,12 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test, bool use_io_uring)
> }
>
> optval = malloc(test->get_optlen);
> + if (!optval) {
> + log_err("Failed to allocate memory");
> + ret = -1;
> + goto close_sock_fd;
> + }
> +
> memset(optval, 0, test->get_optlen);
> socklen_t optlen = test->get_optlen;
> socklen_t expected_get_optlen = test->get_optlen_ret ?:
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
