On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:00 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:55:05 +0800 Tao Su wrote: > > Back to commit 38c957f07038, I don't see any advantage in using LINE_MAX. > > Can we use a fixed value instead of LINE_MAX? E.g., 1024, 2048. Then we > > just need to revert commit 809216233555. > > SGTM, FWIW. The print is printing a test summary line, printing more > than 1k seems rather unreasonable. Other facilities, like TH_LOG(), > should be used for displaying longer info. I also submitted some patches to fix the _GNU_SOURCE issues here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240507214254.2787305-1-edliaw@xxxxxxxxxx/ I'm fine with this approach. It's aligned to what Sean suggested there, since it's causing a lot of troubles for the release cycle.
