On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 3:53 AM Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
<matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Each MPTCP subtest tests test__start_subtest(suffix), then invokes
> test_suffix(). It makes sense to add a new macro RUN_MPTCP_TEST to
> simpolify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> index baf976a7a1dd..9d1b255bb654 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> @@ -347,10 +347,14 @@ static void test_mptcpify(void)
> close(cgroup_fd);
> }
>
> +#define RUN_MPTCP_TEST(suffix) \
> +do { \
> + if (test__start_subtest(#suffix)) \
> + test_##suffix(); \
> +} while (0)
Please no.
Don't hide it behind macros.
> void test_mptcp(void)
> {
> - if (test__start_subtest("base"))
> - test_base();
> - if (test__start_subtest("mptcpify"))
> - test_mptcpify();
> + RUN_MPTCP_TEST(base);
> + RUN_MPTCP_TEST(mptcpify);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
