[PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/8] Implement generic bpf_async cb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a RFC, following[0].

It works, still needs some care but this is mainly to see if this will
have a chance to get upsrteamed or if I should rely on struct_ops
instead.

Cheers,
Benjamin

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Benjamin Tissoires (8):
      bpf: ignore sleepable prog parameter for kfuncs
      bpf: add kfunc_meta parameter to push_callback_call()
      bpf: implement __async and __s_async kfunc suffixes
      bpf: typedef a type for the bpf_wq callbacks
      selftests/bpf: rely on wq_callback_fn_t
      bpf: remove one special case of is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc
      bpf: implement __aux kfunc argument suffix to fetch prog_aux
      bpf: rely on __aux suffix for bpf_wq_set_callback_impl

 kernel/bpf/helpers.c                            |  10 +-
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                           | 333 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h  |   3 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/wq.c          |  10 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/wq_failures.c |   4 +-
 5 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 05cbc217aafbc631a6c2fab4accf95850cb48358
change-id: 20240507-bpf_async-bd2e65847525

Best regards,
-- 
Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux