Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add a null pointer check for the serial_test_tp_attach_query

[Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/24/24 4:04 AM, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> There is a 'malloc' call, which can be unsuccessful.
> Add the malloc failure checking to avoid possible null
> dereference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> index 655d69f0ff0b..302b25408a53 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tp_attach_query.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ void serial_test_tp_attach_query(void)
>   	attr.wakeup_events = 1;
>   
>   	query = malloc(sizeof(*query) + sizeof(__u32) * num_progs);
> +	if (CHECK(!query, "malloc()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno)))

Series looks reasonable, small nit on CHECK() : Lets use ASSERT*() macros given they are
preferred over the latter :

if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))

> +		return;
> +
>   	for (i = 0; i < num_progs; i++) {
>   		err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, &obj[i],
>   				    &prog_fd[i]);