On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 08:13:04AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:54:38 +0200 Mickaël Salaün wrote: > > Jakub, can you please review it? > > I looked thru it. I don't have the cycles to investigate and suggest > a better approach but the sprinkling of mmaps(), if nothing else, feels > a bit band-aid-y 🤷️ The only mmap that could have side effects on existing tests in the _metadata one, but in fact it would reveal issues in tests, so at the end I think it's a good thing. I'd like "self" to not be conditionally shared but that would require changes in several tests. Let's keep that for another release. :) I also noticed that mmap() is already used in test_harness_run() with results.
