Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] riscv: drivers: Convert xandespmu to use the vendor extension framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 06:04:41PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Migrate xandespmu out of riscv_isa_ext and into a new Andes-specific
> vendor namespace.
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 8cbe6e5f9c39..84760ce61e03 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>  #include <asm/errata_list.h>
>  #include <asm/sbi.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <asm/vendorid_list.h>
> +#include <asm/vendor_extensions/andes.h>
>  
>  #define ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW(__ovl)					\
>  asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2(						\
> @@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2(						\
>  		THEAD_VENDOR_ID, ERRATA_THEAD_PMU,			\
>  		CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD_PMU,				\
>  	"csrr %0, " __stringify(ANDES_CSR_SCOUNTEROF),			\
> -		0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_XANDESPMU,				\
> +		ANDES_VENDOR_ID, RISCV_ISA_VENDOR_EXT_XANDESPMU,	\
>  		CONFIG_ANDES_CUSTOM_PMU)				\
>  	: "=r" (__ovl) :						\
>  	: "memory")
> @@ -41,7 +43,7 @@ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2(						\
>  asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(						\
>  	"csrc " __stringify(CSR_IP) ", %0\n\t",				\
>  	"csrc " __stringify(ANDES_CSR_SLIP) ", %0\n\t",			\
> -		0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_XANDESPMU,				\
> +		ANDES_VENDOR_ID, RISCV_ISA_VENDOR_EXT_XANDESPMU,	\
>  		CONFIG_ANDES_CUSTOM_PMU)				\
>  	: : "r"(__irq_mask)						\
>  	: "memory")
> @@ -837,7 +839,7 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
>  		   riscv_cached_mimpid(0) == 0) {
>  		riscv_pmu_irq_num = THEAD_C9XX_RV_IRQ_PMU;
>  		riscv_pmu_use_irq = true;
> -	} else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, XANDESPMU) &&
> +	} else if (riscv_isa_vendor_extension_available(-1, XANDESPMU) &&

What's the rationale for this not using riscv_has_extension_unlikely()?
Happens once in probe so don't bother? I forget if we discussed it when
the code was added, but it would save us from the NULL/-1 syntax,
neither of which I think is a good interface.

Also, I'd prob drop the "drivers" from $subject.

I'll come back and look at the rest of this Monday, it's a sunny Friday
here and I've still got my devicetree patch queue to clear..

Cheers,
Conor.

>  		   IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ANDES_CUSTOM_PMU)) {
>  		riscv_pmu_irq_num = ANDES_SLI_CAUSE_BASE + ANDES_RV_IRQ_PMOVI;
>  		riscv_pmu_use_irq = true;
> 
> -- 
> 2.44.0
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux