Re: [ovs-dev] selftests: openvswitch: Questions about possible enhancements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2024-04-24 18:37 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:44:05PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > Hi Aaron, Jakub, all,
>> > 
>> > I have recently been exercising the Open vSwitch kernel selftests,
>> > using vng, something like this:
>> > 
>> > 	TESTDIR="tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch"
>> > 
>> >         vng -v --run . --user root --cpus 2 \
>> >                 --overlay-rwdir "$PWD" -- \
>> >                 "modprobe openvswitch && \
>> > 		 echo \"timeout=90\" >> \"${TESTDIR}/settings\" && \
>> >                  make -C \"$TESTDIR\" run_tests"
>> > 
>> > And I have some observations that I'd like to ask about.
>> > 
>> > 1. Building the kernel using the following command does not
>> >    build the openvswitch kernel module.
>> > 
>> > 	vng -v --build \
>> > 		--config tools/testing/selftests/net/config
>> > 
>> >    All that seems to be missing is CONFIG_OPENVSWITCH=m
>> >    and I am wondering what the best way of resolving this is.
>> > 
>> >    Perhaps I am doing something wrong.
>> >    Or perhaps tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/config
>> >    should be created? If so, should it include (most of?) what is in
>> >    tools/testing/selftests/net/config, or just CONFIG_OPENVSWITCH=m?
>
> I noticed something similar when testing Jiri's virtio_net selftests
> patchset [1].
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net/config includes virtio options but the
> test also needs at least CONFIG_NET_VRF=y which is part of net/config.
>
> Whatever the answer to your question, all config files should be
> coherent on this matter.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240424104049.3935572-1-jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> [...]
>> 
>>   5. openvswitch.sh starts with "#!/bin/sh".
>>      But substitutions such as "${ns:0:1}0"  fail if /bin/sh is dash.
>>      Perhaps we should change openvswitch.sh to use bash?
>
> I think so. A similar change was done in
> c2518da8e6b0 selftests: bonding: Change script interpreter (v6.8-rc1)

+1 - I'm okay with it.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux