On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:24 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > If the device register fails, free the allocated memory before
> > returning.
>
> * I suggest to use the word “registration” (instead of “register”)
> in the commit message.
>
> * Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” accordingly?
>
>
> > +++ b/lib/kunit/device.c
> > @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static struct kunit_device *kunit_device_register_internal(struct kunit *test,
> > err = device_register(&kunit_dev->dev);
> > if (err) {
> > put_device(&kunit_dev->dev);
> > + kfree(kunit_dev);
> > return ERR_PTR(err);
> > }
>
> Common error handling code can be used instead
> if an additional label would be applied for a corresponding jump target.
>
> How do you think about to increase the application of scope-based resource management here?
>
I thought about that. But I think the code is simple enough (for now)
to not require an exit label.
> Regards,
> Markus
>
