On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:28:47 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > If I have to (: > > Endpoint isn't great. > > But remote doesn't seem much better, and it doesn't have a nice > > abbreviation :( > > It pairs well with local. > > Since in some tests the (local) machine under test is the sender and > in others it is the receiver, we cannot use SERVER/CLIENT or so. Alright. > > > Use FC00::/7 ULA addresses? > > > > Doesn't ULA have some magic address selection rules which IETF > > is just trying to fix now? IIUC 0100:: is the documentation prefix, > > so shouldn't be too bad? > > RFC 6666 defines this as the "Discard Prefix". Alright, let me use Paolo's suggestion of 2001:db8:
