Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: add support for uname(2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Thomas!

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 09:56:23AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> All supported kernels are assumed to use struct new_utsname.
> This is validated in test_uname().
> 
> uname(2) can for example be used in ksft_min_kernel_version() from the
> kernels selftest framework.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240412123536.GA32444@xxxxxxxxxx/

I find it really annoying when other developers waste time trying to
work around some missing trivial syscalls. I would have bet we already
had this one, but obviously not.

That's obviously an ack by me: Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>

Thank you!
Willy




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux