Re: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] cgroup/pids: Separate semantics of pids.events related to pids.max

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 04:23:24PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:55:38AM -1000, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The whole series make sense to me.
> 
> Including the migration charging?
> (Asking whether I should keep it stacked in v4 posting.)

Oh, let's separate that part out. I'm not sure about that. The problem with
can_attach failures is that they're really opaque and the more we do it the
less we'll be able to tell where the failures are coming from, so I'm not
very enthusiastic about them.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux