Re: [PATCH v3 04/30] ntsync: Introduce NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:33:07PM -0500, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> > Rolling your own lock is tricky, and needs review from the locking
> > maintainers.  And probably some more documentation as to what is
> > happening and why our normal types of locks can't be used here?
> 
> Definitely. (Unfortunately this hasn't gotten attention from any locking
> maintainer yet since your last call for review; not sure if there's
> anything I can do there.)

You only seem to have cc:ed one of the "LOCKING PRIMITIVES" maintainers
on this patchset, not all of them, which might be the reason why it has
been ignored :(

Perhaps change that for the next version of this patchset?

thanks,

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux