On 04/11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11 2024 at 13:44, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > Further to my previous mail it's also broken the arm64 selftest builds,
> > they use kselftest.h with nolibc in order to test low level
> > functionality mainly used by libc implementations and nolibc doesn't
> > implement uname():
> >
> > In file included from za-fork.c:12:
> > ../../kselftest.h:433:17: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct utsname'
> > struct utsname info;
> > ^
> > ../../kselftest.h:433:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct utsname'
> > struct utsname info;
> > ^
> > ../../kselftest.h:435:6: error: call to undeclared function 'uname'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2)
> > ^
> > ../../kselftest.h:435:22: error: call to undeclared function 'sscanf'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2)
>
> Grrr. Let me stare at this.
Damn ;)
Can't we just turn ksft_min_kernel_version() into
static inline int ksft_min_kernel_version(unsigned int min_major,
unsigned int min_minor)
{
#ifdef NOLIBC
return -1;
#else
unsigned int major, minor;
struct utsname info;
if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Can't parse kernel version\n");
return major > min_major || (major == min_major && minor >= min_minor);
#endif
}
?
Not sure what should check_timer_distribution() do in this case, to me
ksft_test_result_fail() is fine.
Oleg.
