Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/8] mm: workingset reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 2:44 PM Gregory Price
<gregory.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 02:30:59PM -0700, Yuanchu Xie wrote:
> > I realize this does not generalize well to hotness information, but I
> > lack the intuition for an abstraction that presents hotness in a useful
> > way. Based on a recent proposal for move_phys_pages[2], it seems like
> > userspace tiering software would like to move specific physical pages,
> > instead of informing the kernel "move x number of hot pages to y
> > device". Please advise.
> >
> > [2]
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240319172609.332900-1-gregory.price@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
>
> Please note that this proposed interface (move_phys_pages) is very
> unlikely to be received upstream due to side channel concerns. Instead,
> it's more likely that the tiering component will expose a "promote X
> pages from tier A to tier B", and the kernel component would then
> use/consume hotness information to determine which pages to promote.

I see that mm/memory-tiers.c only has support for demotion. What kind
of hotness information do devices typically provide? The OCP proposal
is not very specific about this.
A list of hot pages with configurable threshold?
Access frequency for all pages at configured granularity?
Is there a way to tell which NUMA node is accessing them, for page promotion?
>
> (Just as one example, there are many more realistic designs)
>
> So if there is a way to expose workingset data to the mm/memory_tiers.c
> component instead of via sysfs/cgroup - that is preferable.

Appreciate the feedback. The data in its current form might be useful
to inform demotion decisions, but for promotion, are you aware of any
recent developments? I would like to encode hotness as workingset data
as well.
>
> The 'move_phys_pages' interface is more of an experimental interface to
> test the effectiveness of this approach without having to plumb out the
> entire system.  Definitely anything userland interface should not be
> designed to generate physical address information for consumption unless
> it is hard-locked behind admin caps.
>
> Regards,
> Gregory





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux