On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 15:57, Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We need to extend the bpf_timer API, but the way forward relies on kfuncs. > So make bpf_timer known for kfuncs from the verifier PoV > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > changes in v5: > - also check for the reg offset > > changes in v4: > - enforce KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER to be of type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE > > new in v3 (split from v2 02/10) > --- > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > index 63749ad5ac6b..24a604e26ec7 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > @@ -10826,6 +10826,7 @@ enum { > KF_ARG_LIST_NODE_ID, > KF_ARG_RB_ROOT_ID, > KF_ARG_RB_NODE_ID, > + KF_ARG_TIMER_ID, > }; > > BTF_ID_LIST(kf_arg_btf_ids) > @@ -10834,6 +10835,7 @@ BTF_ID(struct, bpf_list_head) > BTF_ID(struct, bpf_list_node) > BTF_ID(struct, bpf_rb_root) > BTF_ID(struct, bpf_rb_node) > +BTF_ID(struct, bpf_timer_kern) > > static bool __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(const struct btf *btf, > const struct btf_param *arg, int type) > @@ -10877,6 +10879,12 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_rbtree_node(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_par > return __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(btf, arg, KF_ARG_RB_NODE_ID); > } > > +static bool is_kfunc_arg_timer(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_param *arg) > +{ > + bool ret = __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(btf, arg, KF_ARG_TIMER_ID); > + return ret; > +} > + > static bool is_kfunc_arg_callback(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct btf *btf, > const struct btf_param *arg) > { > @@ -10946,6 +10954,7 @@ enum kfunc_ptr_arg_type { > KF_ARG_PTR_TO_NULL, > KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR, > KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MAP, > + KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER, > }; > > enum special_kfunc_type { > @@ -11102,6 +11111,9 @@ get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, > if (is_kfunc_arg_map(meta->btf, &args[argno])) > return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MAP; > > + if (is_kfunc_arg_timer(meta->btf, &args[argno])) > + return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER; > + > if ((base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID || reg2btf_ids[base_type(reg->type)])) { > if (!btf_type_is_struct(ref_t)) { > verbose(env, "kernel function %s args#%d pointer type %s %s is not supported\n", > @@ -11735,6 +11747,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ > case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CALLBACK: > case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_REFCOUNTED_KPTR: > case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR: > + case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER: > /* Trusted by default */ > break; > default: > @@ -12021,6 +12034,16 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_ > if (ret) > return ret; > break; > + case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER: > + if (reg->type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) { > + verbose(env, "arg#%d doesn't point to a map value\n", i); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + if (reg->off) { > + verbose(env, "arg#%d offset can not be greater than 0\n", i); > + return -EINVAL; > + } This won't be correct. You don't really check whether the timer exists at reg->off (and if you did, this would still restrict it to 0 offset, and not check the variable offset which would be non-zero). What I would suggest is calling process_timer_func (see how dynptr calls the same underlying process_dynptr_func to enforce type invariants). This would allow sharing the same checks and avoid bugs from creeping in. It does all checks wrt constant/variable offset and looking up the timer field offset and matching it against the one in the pointer. > + break; > } > } > > > -- > 2.44.0 > >