Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] selftests/resctrl: Add ->init() callback into resctrl_val_param

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-03-13 at 13:37:51 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Mar 2024, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
>> On 2024-03-13 at 11:15:30 +0100, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
>> >On 2024-03-11 at 15:52:25 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> >>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
>> >>index 241c0b129b58..e79eca9346f3 100644
>> >>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
>> >>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cmt_test.c
>> >>@@ -16,6 +16,17 @@
>> >> #define MAX_DIFF		2000000
>> >> #define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT	15
>> >> 
>> >>+#define CON_MON_LCC_OCCUP_PATH		\
>> >>+	"%s/%s/mon_groups/%s/mon_data/mon_L3_%02d/llc_occupancy"
>> >>+
>> >>+static int set_cmt_path(const struct resctrl_val_param *param, int domain_id)
>> >>+{
>> >>+	sprintf(llc_occup_path,	CON_MON_LCC_OCCUP_PATH,	RESCTRL_PATH,
>> >>+		param->ctrlgrp, param->mongrp, domain_id);
>> >>+
>> >>+	return 0;
>> >>+}
>> >>+
>> >
>> >Is there an option to make this function (and the set_mbm_path()) global through
>> >the resctrl.h?
>> >
>> >I'd like to use it in my SNC series [1] for looping over different nodes and
>> >that requires changing the paths during the measure phase of the tests and that
>> >part is currently in cache.c:measure_llc_resctrl().
>> >
>> >Or would you suggest some other way of changing these paths in cache?
>> >
>> 
>> +forgot to add the link :b
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1709721159.git.maciej.wieczor-retman@xxxxxxxxx/
>
>Perhaps ->init() should just prepare an array of filenames to read from 
>to support SNC. That would keep the filename preparations out of the 
>measurement period.
>
>It feels slightly hacky to have an array of files but I cannot think of 
>anything else that would be cleaner and would not require creating the 
>filenames during the actual test.

So the array of names would be a part of "struct resctrl_val_param"?

It would have to be dynamically allocated too before running the tests.

I kinda agree, creating filenames during measurements messes the whole
separation idea between setup and measuring. And as you said there are like 4
nodes max so not much memory would be wasted there.

I can experiment with it and try to add it in my series - since it's much more
tied to SNC. Unless you see it'd better fit here then that's fine with me too.

>
>
>-- 
> i.


-- 
Kind regards
Maciej Wieczór-Retman




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux