Richard Gobert wrote: > Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 4:35 PM Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> {inet,ipv6}_gro_receive functions perform flush checks (ttl, flags, > >> iph->id, ...) against all packets in a loop. These flush checks are > >> relevant only to tcp flows, and as such they're used to determine whether > >> the packets can be merged later in tcp_gro_receive. > >> > >> These checks are not relevant to UDP packets. > > > > I do not think this claim is true. > > > > Incoming packets -> GRO -> GSO -> forwarded packets > > > > The {GRO,GSO} step must be transparent, GRO is not LRO. > > Sorry, I should rephrase myself. The patch preserves the > current logic in GRO. These L3 checks (ttl, flags, etc.) are written to > NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->{flush,flush_id}, and NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_atomic - and > all of these are currently used only in tcp_gro_receive. That was perhaps an oversight when adding UDP GRO? Simply because the flush is determined in the innermost callback.