On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 01:03:26PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Tue, 2024-02-20 at 11:22 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all > > tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they > > expect to fail, because the kselftest_harness limits the return > > codes to pass/fail/skip. > > > > Clean up and support the use of the full range of ksft exit codes > > under kselftest_harness. > > > > Merge plan is to put it on top of -rc4 and merge into net-next. > > That way others should be able to pull the patches without > > any networking changes. > > > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240216002619.1999225-1-kuba@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > - fix alignment > > follow up RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240216004122.2004689-1-kuba@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240213154416.422739-1-kuba@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > @Shuah: it's not clear to me if you prefer to take this series via the > kselftests tree or we can take it via the net-next tree. Could you > please advise? > > thanks! > > Paolo > > p.s. if this was already clarified in the past, I'm sorry: I lost track > of it. Given the urgency for net-dev and the lack of conflicts with other kselftest changes (AFAICT), I would assume it would be fine to carry this in net-dev (especially since the merge window fast approaches). Shuah, any objection? -Kees -- Kees Cook
