On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:05:03 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> While we have test coverage for the ptrace interface in our selftests
> the current programs have a number of gaps. The testing is done per
> regset so does not cover interactions and at no point do any of the
> tests actually run the traced processes meaning that there is no
> validation that anything we read or write corresponds to register values
> the process actually sees. Let's add a new program which attempts to cover
> these gaps.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!
[1/1] kselftest/arm64: Test that ptrace takes effect in the target process
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/c745b15c1f9c
--
Catalin
