Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: selftests: memop: add a simple AR test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 21:53 +0100, Eric Farman wrote:
> There is a selftest that checks for an (expected) error when an
> invalid AR is specified, but not one that exercises the AR path.
> 
> Add a simple test that mirrors the vanilla write/read test while
> providing an AR. An AR that contains zero will direct the CPU to
> use the primary address space normally used anyway. AR[1] is
> selected for this test because the host AR[1] is usually non-zero,
> and KVM needs to correctly swap those values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> index bb3ca9a5d731..be20c26ee545 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,29 @@ static void test_copy(void)
>  	kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
>  }
> 
> +static void test_copy_access_register(void)
> +{
> +	struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy);
> +
> +	HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED);
> +
> +	prepare_mem12();
> +	t.run->psw_mask &= ~(3UL << (63 - 17));
> +	t.run->psw_mask |= 1UL << (63 - 17);  /* Enable AR mode */
> +

I feel like part of the commit message should be a comment here

/*
 * Guest AR[1] should be zero, in which case the primary address space is used.
 * The host makes use of AR[1], its value must not be used for the memop.
 */
> +	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, WRITE, mem1, t.size,
> +		   GADDR_V(mem1), AR(1));
> +	HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_COPIED);
> +
> +	CHECK_N_DO(MOP, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, READ, mem2, t.size,
> +		   GADDR_V(mem2), AR(1));
> +	ASSERT_MEM_EQ(mem1, mem2, t.size);
> +
> +	t.run->psw_mask &= ~(3UL << (63 - 17));   /* Disable AR mode */

Any reason for this? It's not necessary since the vm is going to be destroyed.
> +
> +	kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
> +}
> +
>  static void set_storage_key_range(void *addr, size_t len, uint8_t key)
>  {
>  	uintptr_t _addr, abs, i;
> @@ -1101,6 +1124,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  			.test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override,
>  			.requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
>  		},
> +		{
> +			.name = "copy with access register mode",
> +			.test = test_copy_access_register,
> +			.requirements_met = true,
> +		},
>  		{
>  			.name = "error checks with key",
>  			.test = test_errors_key,






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux