On 19/02/2024 22:06, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024, Paul Durrant wrote:David Woodhouse (1): KVM: pfncache: rework __kvm_gpc_refresh() to fix locking issues Paul Durrant (19): KVM: pfncache: Add a map helper function KVM: pfncache: remove unnecessary exports KVM: x86/xen: mark guest pages dirty with the pfncache lock held KVM: pfncache: add a mark-dirty helper KVM: pfncache: remove KVM_GUEST_USES_PFN usage KVM: pfncache: stop open-coding offset_in_page() KVM: pfncache: include page offset in uhva and use it consistently KVM: pfncache: allow a cache to be activated with a fixed (userspace) HVA KVM: x86/xen: separate initialization of shared_info cache and content KVM: x86/xen: re-initialize shared_info if guest (32/64-bit) mode is set KVM: x86/xen: allow shared_info to be mapped by fixed HVA KVM: x86/xen: allow vcpu_info to be mapped by fixed HVA KVM: selftests: map Xen's shared_info page using HVA rather than GFN KVM: selftests: re-map Xen's vcpu_info using HVA rather than GPA KVM: x86/xen: advertize the KVM_XEN_HVM_CONFIG_SHARED_INFO_HVA capability KVM: x86/xen: split up kvm_xen_set_evtchn_fast() KVM: x86/xen: don't block on pfncache locks in kvm_xen_set_evtchn_fast() KVM: pfncache: check the need for invalidation under read lock first KVM: x86/xen: allow vcpu_info content to be 'safely' copied Sean Christopherson (1): KVM: s390: Refactor kvm_is_error_gpa() into kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot() Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 53 ++- arch/s390/kvm/diag.c | 2 +- arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 14 +- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 +- arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 4 +- arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 +- arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 361 +++++++++++------ include/linux/kvm_host.h | 49 ++- include/linux/kvm_types.h | 8 - include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 9 +- .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/xen_shinfo_test.c | 59 ++- virt/kvm/pfncache.c | 382 ++++++++++-------- 13 files changed, 591 insertions(+), 363 deletions(-)Except for the read_trylock() patch, just a few nits that I can fixup when applying, though I'll defeinitely want your eyeballs on the end result as they tweaks aren't _that_ trivial. Running tests now, if all goes well I'll push to kvm-x86 within the hour.
Oh, I read this last and you already made the changes :-) I'll check kvm-x86. Thanks.
