From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fullmesh endpoints could end-up unexpectedly generating duplicate
subflows - same local and remote addresses - when multiple incoming
ADD_ADDR are processed before the PM creates the subflow for the local
endpoints.
Address the issue explicitly checking for duplicates at subflow
creation time.
To avoid a quadratic computational complexity, track the unavailable
remote address ids in a temporary bitmap and initialize such bitmap
with the remote ids of all the existing subflows matching the local
address currently processed.
The above allows additionally replacing the existing code checking
for duplicate entry in the current set with a simple bit test
operation.
Fixes: 2843ff6f36db ("mptcp: remote addresses fullmesh")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/435
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index ed6983af1ab2..58d17d9604e7 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -396,19 +396,6 @@ void mptcp_pm_free_anno_list(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
}
}
-static bool lookup_address_in_vec(const struct mptcp_addr_info *addrs, unsigned int nr,
- const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr)
-{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
- if (addrs[i].id == addr->id)
- return true;
- }
-
- return false;
-}
-
/* Fill all the remote addresses into the array addrs[],
* and return the array size.
*/
@@ -440,6 +427,16 @@ static unsigned int fill_remote_addresses_vec(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
msk->pm.subflows++;
addrs[i++] = remote;
} else {
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(unavail_id, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1);
+
+ /* Forbid creation of new subflows matching existing
+ * ones, possibly already created by incoming ADD_ADDR
+ */
+ bitmap_zero(unavail_id, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1);
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
+ if (READ_ONCE(subflow->local_id) == local->id)
+ __set_bit(subflow->remote_id, unavail_id);
+
mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
remote_address((struct sock_common *)ssk, &addrs[i]);
@@ -447,11 +444,17 @@ static unsigned int fill_remote_addresses_vec(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
if (deny_id0 && !addrs[i].id)
continue;
+ if (test_bit(addrs[i].id, unavail_id))
+ continue;
+
if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, local, &addrs[i]))
continue;
- if (!lookup_address_in_vec(addrs, i, &addrs[i]) &&
- msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max) {
+ if (msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max) {
+ /* forbid creating multiple address towards
+ * this id
+ */
+ __set_bit(addrs[i].id, unavail_id);
msk->pm.subflows++;
i++;
}
--
2.43.0
