On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 12:18 -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > > So, don't we want to consume the token on the *new* task's MM, which > was already duplicated but still unmapped? In which case I think the > other arch's would need to GUP regardless of the existence of shadow > stack atomic ops. I mean for the !CLONE_VM case.
