On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 16:27:40 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> The gro self-tests sends the packets to be aggregated with
> multiple write operations.
>
> When running is slow environment, it's hard to guarantee that
> the GRO engine will wait for the last packet in an intended
> train.
>
> The above causes almost deterministic failures in our CI for
> the 'large' test-case.
>
> Address the issue explicitly ignoring failures for such case
> in slow environments (KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW==true).
>
> Fixes: 7d1575014a63 ("selftests/net: GRO coalesce test")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Note that the fixes tag is there mainly to justify targeting the net
> tree, and this is aiming at net to hopefully make the test more stable
> ASAP for both trees.
>
> I experimented with a largish refactory replacing the multiple writes
> with a single GSO packet, but exhausted by time budget before reaching
> any good result.
It does make things a lot more stable, but there was still a failure
recently:
https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net-dbg/results/455661/36-gro-sh/stdout
:(
