On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:38 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 9:23 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > the udpgro_fraglist self-test uses the BPF classifiers, but the > > > current net self-test configuration does not include it, causing > > > CI failures: > > > > > > # selftests: net: udpgro_frglist.sh > > > # ipv6 > > > # tcp - over veth touching data > > > # -l 4 -6 -D 2001:db8::1 -t rx -4 -t > > > # Error: TC classifier not found. > > > # We have an error talking to the kernel > > > # Error: TC classifier not found. > > > # We have an error talking to the kernel > > > > > > Add the missing knob. > > > > > > Fixes: edae34a3ed92 ("selftests net: add UDP GRO fraglist + bpf self-tests") > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > FYI, while looking at the gro test, I found that using strace was > > making it failing as well. > > It looks like the gro.sh (large) tests send the to-be-aggregate > segments individually and relay on the gro flush timeout being large > enough to fit all the relevant write operations. I suspect/hope > something alike: > > --- > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/setup_veth.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/setup_veth.sh > index a9a1759e035c..1f78a87f6f37 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/setup_veth.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/setup_veth.sh > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ setup_veth_ns() { > local -r ns_mac="$4" > > [[ -e /var/run/netns/"${ns_name}" ]] || ip netns add "${ns_name}" > - echo 100000 > "/sys/class/net/${ns_dev}/gro_flush_timeout" > + echo 1000000 > "/sys/class/net/${ns_dev}/gro_flush_timeout" > ip link set dev "${ns_dev}" netns "${ns_name}" mtu 65535 > ip -netns "${ns_name}" link set dev "${ns_dev}" up > --- > should solve the sporadic issues. I think you are right. I tried multiple values, and found 600,000 was not enough in some cases. With 1,000,000, I was able to run the test (with the strace overhead) 100 times without a single failure. > > > Not sure about this one... > > All the udpgro* test should write a single UDP GSO packet and let the > veth segmenting it, hopefully slowing down either ends should not > impact them - but I did not check yet! > > Perhaps even the gro.sh tests could be modified alike? > > Cheers, > > Paolo >